Mohammadpur, Dhaka |

After the Review: How to Effectively Manage Comments on Your Manuscript

Dr Ahsanur Rahman, PHD

Spread the love

After you have solicited feedback on your manuscript and made the necessary changes, it is important to effectively manage the comments that you receive. Here are a few tips: 1. Be sure to thank the person who took the time to read and comment on your work.

A simple “thank you” goes a long way. 2. Take some time to digest the comments before responding. It can be helpful to sleep on it or take a walk before replying.

3. Respond thoughtfully to each comment, considering whether or not you agree with the suggestion and why. If you decide not to make a change, be sure to explain your reasoning. 4. Don’t take criticism personally—remember that the goal is to improve your manuscript, not attack you as a writer.

After you’ve finished writing your manuscript and have sent it off to be reviewed, the next step is to effectively manage comments on your work. This can be a difficult task, especially if you’re not used to dealing with feedback. Here are a few tips on how to effectively manage comments on your manuscript:

1. Take some time to read through all of the comments carefully before responding to any of them. It’s important to understand what each reviewer is saying before you start addressing their concerns. 2. Respond to each comment thoughtfully and concisely.

Thank the reviewer for their input and let them know that you’re taking their suggestions into consideration. 3. If there are multiple reviewers with conflicting comments, try to come up with a compromise that will satisfy everyone involved. It’s important to keep all of the reviewers happy so that they’ll be more likely to give your work a positive review when it’s published.

4. Don’t get defensive about your work or take any negative feedback personally. It’s important to remember that reviewers are just trying to help you improve your manuscript so that it can be published successfully.

How to Respond to Reviewer Comments Journal Example

If you’re like most scholars, you’ve probably had the experience of having a journal article rejected. Maybe it was a paper that you spent months working on, or maybe it was a piece that you thought was pretty good but could be improved. Either way, it can be disheartening to get negative feedback from reviewers.

But don’t despair! A rejection is not the end of the world, and in fact, it can be an opportunity to improve your paper and make it more likely to be accepted next time around. Here’s how to respond to reviewers’ comments journal example:

First of all, take a deep breath and read through the reviewers’ comments carefully. It can be helpful to highlight or make notes in the margins so that you can easily refer back to them later. Once you’ve done that, sit down with your co-authors (if you have any) and discuss what changes need to be made.

Once you’ve decided on the changes that need to be made, start revising your paper. Be sure to address each of the reviewers’ comments as they appear in your revised manuscript. In some cases, reviewer comments will conflict with each other; in these cases, use your best judgment about which change is more important or makes more sense for your particular paper.

Finally, submit your revised paper to the journal along with a cover letter explaining how you have addressed each of the reviewer’s comments. If everything goes well, your paper will now be under consideration for publication!

Point-By-Point Response to Reviewers

If you’re like most scholars, you’ve probably had at least one paper rejected by a journal. The good news is that reviewers’ comments can provide valuable feedback that can help you improve your paper and increase the chances of getting it accepted elsewhere. The key to responding effectively to reviewers is to take an organized approach.

First, read through all of the reviewers’ comments carefully. Next, decide which of the reviewers’ points you agree with and which you disagree with. Finally, craft a point-by-point response that addresses each of the reviewers’ comments in a constructive way.

Here are some tips for responding to reviewers: 1. Be polite and professional. Remember that the reviewers are trying to help improve your paper, even if their comments are critical.

2. Be clear and concise in your response. Reviewers appreciate when authors take the time to thoughtfully address their concerns. 3. Be specific about how you plan to revise your paper based on the reviewer’s comments.

This will show the reviewer that you have taken their feedback seriously and are committed to improving your work. 4 . Avoid simply repeating what you said in your original paper .

Instead, focus on explaining why the reviewer’s concern is not valid or how you have addressed it in your revised version . 5 . Don’t be afraid to ask for clarification if there is something you don’t understand about a reviewer’s comment .

This shows that you’re engaged with the review process and willing to make changes based on feedback .

Response to Reviewers’ Comments Elsevier

If you’re an author who has recently submitted a manuscript to Elsevier, you may be wondering how to respond to reviewers’ comments. Fortunately,Elsevier has some guidelines that can help you through the process. First and foremost, it’s important to remember that reviewers are providing their feedback in order to improve your manuscript.

As such, try to take their comments constructively and use them as an opportunity to make your paper even better. When responding to reviewers’ comments, start by addressing each point individually. If a reviewer has made multiple suggestions, prioritize which ones you think are most important and address those first.

It’s also helpful to quote the specific text from the review when referencing each comment. Next, provide a clear and concise response for each comment. If you agree with the reviewer’s suggestion, explain how you will implement it in your revised manuscript.

If you disagree with the suggestion, provide a justification for why you think it isn’t necessary or appropriate. In either case, be polite and professional in your responses. Finally, if there are any points that need clarification or additional explanation, don’t hesitate to ask the reviewer for more information.

By doing so, you can avoid misunderstandings and ensure that your revised manuscript is exactly what they’re looking for.

Reviewer Comments Example

A reviewer comments example is a great way to see what other people think about your work. It can help you improve your writing and make sure that you are on the right track. There are a few things to keep in mind when looking at a reviewer comments example, however.

First, remember that not all reviewers will have the same opinion as you do. Secondly, take into account the different types of feedback that they may have. And finally, don’t be afraid to ask for clarification if there is something that you don’t understand.

Reviewer Comments to Revised Manuscript

Reviewer Comments to Revised Manuscript: The manuscript has been significantly improved and the authors have addressed all of the reviewers’ concerns. The study is now more focused and provides a clearer rationale for its purpose.

The data are also much better presented and analyzed. Overall, this is a much stronger piece of work that makes an important contribution to our understanding of [this topic].

Disagree With Reviewer Comments

If you disagree with reviewer comments, the best course of action is to reach out to the journal editor. Explain your position and provide any additional information or context that may be helpful in making a decision about your paper. The editor will then either make a decision themselves or consult with the reviewers before making a final determination.

Peer Review Response Examples

When it comes to giving feedback, there is no one-size-fits-all approach. However, there are some general tips that can help you give effective feedback to your peers. Here are a few peer review response examples to get you started:

1. Make sure your feedback is specific and constructive. If you simply tell your peer that their work is good or bad, they won’t be able to improve. Instead, focus on specific aspects of the work and offer constructive suggestions for improvement.

For example, if you thought a particular section was confusing, suggest how it could be rewritten more clearly. 2. Avoid making personal comments. Your feedback should focus on the work itself, not on the person who created it.

Personal comments can come across as mean-spirited or unprofessional, and they won’t help your peer improve their work. If you have something negative to say about someone’s work, frame it in a way that focuses on the work itself rather than attacking the person who created it. 3. Be respectful of other people’s time and energy.

Comments for Journal Submission Sample

The journal submission process can be a daunting one, especially if you’re not sure what to expect. Comments from editors and reviewers are an important part of the process, and can help you improve your paper before it’s accepted for publication. If you’re submitting a paper to a journal, chances are you’ll receive feedback in the form of comments from the editor and/or reviewers.

These comments can range from positive (encouraging you to submit your revised paper) to negative (pointing out flaws in your research or writing). Either way, it’s important to take these comments seriously and use them to improve your paper before resubmitting it for consideration. Here are some tips for handling journal submission comments:

• Read through all of the comments carefully before making any changes to your paper. It’s easy to get overwhelmed by negative feedback, but try to look at the big picture and identify what needs to be improved. • If there are multiple reviewers’ comments, prioritize which ones need to be addressed first.

Not all of the suggestions may be feasible or even necessary, so it’s up to you to decide what will make the biggest impact on your paper. • Use specific language when addressing each comment – this will show the reviewer that you’ve taken their suggestion seriously. For example, if a reviewer suggests adding more data analysis, specifically mention what type of data analysis will be added and where in the paper it will go.

After the Review: How to Effectively Manage Comments on Your Manuscript
After the Review: How to Effectively Manage Comments on Your Manuscript 4


How Do You Deal With Reviewer Comments?

When you receive reviewer comments, the first thing you should do is read through them carefully. Make sure you understand what the reviewer is saying and why they are saying it. Once you have a clear understanding of the comments, you can start to formulate a plan for how to address them.

If the reviewer has made suggestions for changes or additions, decide which ones you agree with and make a note of them. For each suggestion, consider whether it is something you can implement yourself or if you will need help from others. If the latter, reach out to those people and let them know what needs to be done.

Once you have a plan for addressing the comments, start working through them one by one. As you make changes, keep track of what was changed and why. This will be helpful later on if there are any questions about your decisions.

Work through all of the reviewers’ comments until they are all addressed to your satisfaction. At that point, your work is ready for resubmission!

How Do You Respond to Reviewer Comments on a Manuscript?

If you’re like most people, getting feedback on your work can be tough to take. But whether you’re submitting a manuscript to a journal or presenting a research paper at a conference, chances are you’ll have to deal with reviewer comments at some point. So how do you respond to reviewer comments?

First, it’s important to remember that reviewers are not trying to be mean or make your life difficult. They’re simply trying to help improve the quality of your work. Second, try to take the time to understand what the reviewer is saying and why they’re saying it.

It’s also helpful to step back and look at your work from their perspective. Finally, once you’ve taken all of this into consideration, formulate a thoughtful and polite response that addresses their concerns while still maintaining your own voice and vision for the project.

How Do You Reply After Reviewing a Document?

Assuming you would like tips for responding to a document: When you are given a document to review, it is important to take some time to process the information. Read through the document carefully and make note of any questions or concerns you have.

Once you have a good understanding of the document, you can start crafting your response. Be sure to address all of the points that were raised in the document. If there are points that you do not agree with, explain why.

Offer alternative solutions if applicable. Be respectful and professional in your response, even if you do not agree with the contents of the document. Take your time when writing your response.

Make sure that all of your points are clear and concise. Once you are satisfied with your response, send it back to the person who gave you the document for review.

What are the Basic Principles for Replying to Referees Comments of Your Manuscript?

The principles for replying to referees’ comments are important for every author, whether they are submitting their work to a journal or another publication. Here are the basic principles: 1. Thank the referee for taking the time to read and comment on your manuscript.

This is especially important if the feedback is positive. 2. Be professional in your response. This means using proper grammar and not resorting to personal attacks or insults.

3. Take the time to address each of the referee’s comments thoroughly. If you do not agree with a particular point, explain why in a rational manner.

How to respond Reviewer's/Editor's Comment for Manuscript Revision | #Response #letter #reviewer's


It’s no secret that the review process can be daunting, especially when it comes to managing comments on your manuscript. But don’t despair! In this post, we’ll share some tips on how to effectively manage comments so you can get your paper published in no time.

First, take a deep breath and relax. It’s important to remember that reviewers are not out to get you; they just want to help improve your paper. So try to keep an open mind as you read through their comments.

Next, make a list of all the comments and prioritize them by importance. Not all comments will need to be addressed in the final version of your paper; some may be minor suggestions that you can fix easily or ignore altogether. So it’s up to you to decide which ones are worth addressing and which ones you can safely ignore.

Once you’ve prioritized your list, start working through the comments one by one. For each comment, ask yourself if it’s something that should be changed or clarified in the paper. If so, make the necessary changes in your manuscript and then move on to the next comment.

If not, simply note why you’re ignoring the comment (e.g., “this is a minor point that doesn’t impact the overall message of my paper”) and move on. Finally, once you’ve addressed all the important comments, it’s time to submit your revised manuscript for publication! With these tips in mind, managing reviewer comments will be a breeze – good luck! Protection Status